RSS Feed

4) Do the Prophet (saww) and Imams (as) have knowledge of everything?

Do the Prophet (saww) and Imams (as) have knowledge of everything? (A Quranic analysis)

(please note that this is a chapter from the book “Ghuluw” which can be downloaded from the “PDF Download Files” section.)

(For a better understanding, start from the first blog (Definition and condemnation….))

Now that we have seen (refer to the previous post on hadith fabrication) how thousands of narrations were fabricated by different groups and inserted into the books of the companions of our Imams (as), let us take a look at how these false beliefs openly and clearly contradict the Quran.

At this point we should remind the readers about the instruction of Imam al Ridha (as) where he says:

…You should not accept any hadith that is attributed to us if it is in conflict with the Quran because whatever we say is in harmony with the Quran and Sunnah of the Prophet (saww) as we only narrate from God and his messenger.” (Rijal Kashi)

Imam Sadiq (as) says: “Do not accept any narration except that which is in line with the Quran and Sunnah, or what you find in the narrations of the previous Imams (as), because Mughira bin Sa’eed, may curse of Allah be on him, inserted such narrations in the books of the companions of my father (Imam Baqir (as)) which he (as) had never said…..” (Rijal Kashi)

First let us state what the present day general Shia belief is regarding the knowledge of Prophet (saww) and the Imams (as).

Most Shias believe that the Prophet (saww) and Imams (as) have full knowledge of everything from the past and future, from the time they are born, to be precise, not just since they are born, rather since much before that (since it is believed that they were the first creation). It is also believed that the Prophet (saww) and Imams (as) were already aware of the Quran, even before it was revealed, and a popular incident is repeatedly narrated in religious lectures, which says that when Imams Ali (as) was born and was in the arms of the Prophet (saww) he recited the whole Quran (even though the Quran had not been revealed at that time.)

Let us look at what the Quran has to say regarding this?

Verse 1:

After narrating the story of Prophet Nuh (as), Allah (swt) says to Prophet Muhammad (saww), in Surah Hud 11:49

تِلْكَ مِنْ أَنبَاءِ الْغَيْبِ نُوحِيهَا إِلَيْكَ ۖ مَا كُنتَ تَعْلَمُهَا أَنتَ وَلَا قَوْمُكَ مِن قَبْلِ هَٰذَا ۖ فَاصْبِرْ ۖ إِنَّ الْعَاقِبَةَ لِلْمُتَّقِينَ

That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. You knew it not, neither you nor your people, before this. So be patient; indeed, the [best] outcome is for the righteous.

This is such a clear verse, Allah (swt) is clearly saying that Rasulallah (saww) did not know about this (events of Nuh a.s) before it was revealed to him in the Quran. Allah (swt) made it crystal clear by adding “..neither you nor your people, before this”.

Bearing in mind that the (so called) scholars are very good at twisting the meaning of verses to suit their beliefs, if the verse had only said “..You (oh Prophet) did not know this..”, the scholars could have said, well this verse is talking about Alam e Dharr, or Alam al arwah, even before Adam was created, that is the time when Allah (swt) revealed to our Prophet (saww) the story of Nooh. Well Allah (swt) clarified it by saying “..neither you nor your people..” knew it “BEFORE THIS..”, which clearly shows that Allah (swt) is talking about this world, not some other realm.
This clearly proves that the Prophet (saww) does not know everything from the past (like story of Nuh (as)), and this also proves that the Prophet (saww) was not even aware of the Quran before it was revealed to him in this world.

Verse 2:

In Surah Saad 38:67-70, Allah (swt) instructs the Prophet (saww) to say to the people

قُلْ هُوَ نَبَأٌ عَظِيمٌ

مَا كَانَ لِيَ مِنْ عِلْمٍ بِالْمَلَإِ الْأَعْلَىٰ إِذْ يَخْتَصِمُونَ

إِن يُوحَىٰ إِلَيَّ إِلَّا أَنَّمَا أَنَا نَذِيرٌ مُّبِينٌ

Say, “It is great news from which you turn away.

I had no knowledge of the exalted assembly [of angels] when they were disputing [the creation of Adam].

It has not been revealed to me except that I am a clear warner.”

Mala e A’ala, according to most Mufassireen refers to the incident when Angels were asked to Prostrate in front of Adam (as), and there was a controversy. Irrespective of what it means, one thing is clear, that the Prophet (saww) was not aware of “Mala e A’ala” when it took place, even though according to popular belief, the Prophet (saww) was created much before Adam (as), so he (saww) should have witnessed whatever happened  in Mala e A’ala.

Verse 3:

Allah (swt) says to Rasulallah (saww) in Surah Tawba 9:101

وَمِمَّنْ حَوْلَكُم مِّنَ الْأَعْرَابِ مُنَافِقُونَ ۖ وَمِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ ۖ مَرَدُوا عَلَى النِّفَاقِ لَا تَعْلَمُهُمْ ۖ نَحْنُ نَعْلَمُهُمْ ۚ سَنُعَذِّبُهُم مَّرَّتَيْنِ ثُمَّ يُرَدُّونَ إِلَىٰ عَذَابٍ عَظِيمٍ

And among those around you of the Bedouins are hypocrites, and [also] from the people of Madinah. They have become accustomed to hypocrisy. You, [O Muhammad], do not know them, [but] We know them. We will punish them twice [in this world]; then they will be returned to a great punishment.

Not just, past and future, like any normal human being, the Prophet (saww) was even unaware of the people of his own time, and in his own city, that’s why Allah (swt) says “You do not know them…”.

Verse 4:

Before narrating the story of Prophet Yusuf (as), Allah says to Rasulallah (saww) in Surah Yusuf 12:3

نَحْنُ نَقُصُّ عَلَيْكَ أَحْسَنَ الْقَصَصِ بِمَا أَوْحَيْنَا إِلَيْكَ هَٰذَا الْقُرْآنَ وَإِن كُنتَ مِن قَبْلِهِ لَمِنَ الْغَافِلِينَ

We relate to you, [O Muhammad], the best of stories in what We have revealed to you of this Qur’an although you were, before it, among the unaware.

An argument is made that the word “ghaafil” does not mean “unaware” rather it means that Rasulallah (saww) was aware, but did not tell the people.

Well why would Allah (swt) call Rasulallah (saww) “Ghafil” (which is a negative word) while Rasulallah (saww) only says something when Allah asks him to say it?

Also if we assume that Rasulallah (saww) knew everything, then Nauzobillah even when he died he was ghaafil, because he did not tell the people all that he knew in his life. This is clearly illogical.
Also see 6:131, 6:156, 7:172 etc where word ghaafil is used for being “unaware”

Verse 5:

In Surah Ahqaf 46:9, Allah (swt) asks Rasulallah (saww) to say to his people

قُلْ مَا كُنتُ بِدْعًا مِّنَ الرُّسُلِ وَمَا أَدْرِي مَا يُفْعَلُ بِي وَلَا بِكُمْ ۖ إِنْ أَتَّبِعُ إِلَّا مَا يُوحَىٰ إِلَيَّ وَمَا أَنَا إِلَّا نَذِيرٌ مُّبِينٌ

Say, “I am not something new among the messengers, nor do I know what will be done with me or with you. I only follow that which is revealed to me, and I am not but a clear warner.”

Some people say, well when this verse says “What will be done with me and you” it is talking about Day of Judgment, and that is not included in Ilm al Ghayb, rather everything that happens before the Day of Judgment is included in Ilm al ghayb.

This is against what Imam Ali (as) has been quoted to have said in Nahjul Balagha, Sermon 128. While Imam Ali (as) was informing the people of certain future events, a person from the tribe of Kalb stood up and said “O Amir al-mu’minin, you have been given knowledge of Ghayb. (Because this companion was thinking, if the Imam doesn’t have Ilmul Ghayb, then how can he tell us about these future events, but the Imam corrected him as you will see below:)

Whereupon Amir al-mu’minin (as) laughed and said to the man who belonged to the tribe of Banu Kalb:

“O brother of Kalb! This is not knowledge of hidden things (`ilmu’l-ghayb); rather, these are simply matters I have learned from a possessor of knowledge (i.e. the Prophet) who knew them. As for knowledge of Ghyab, that encompasses the knowledge of the Day of Judgement, and the things covered by Allah in the verse:

“Verily, Allah is He with Whom is the knowledge of the Hour; He sends down the rain, and He knows what is in the wombs. No soul knows what it will earn tomorrow, and no soul knows in what land it will die..” (Qur’an, 31:34)

Therefore, Allah alone knows what is there in the wombs, whether male or female, ugly or handsome, generous or miserly, mischievous or pious, and who will be the fuel for Hell and who will be in the company of the Prophets in Paradise. This is the knowledge of the hidden things which is not known to anyone save Allah. Other than this is that whose knowledge Allah passed on to His Prophet and he passed it on to me, and prayed for me that my bosom may retain it and my ribs may hold it.”

As we can see, according to Imam Ali (as), the Day of Judgment is included in Ilm al Ghayb, therefore not having knowledge about the Day of Judgment implies not having Ilm al ghayb.

Verse 6:

Allah (swt) instructs Rasulallah (saww) to say to his people, in Surah An’aam 6:50

قُل لَّا أَقُولُ لَكُمْ عِندِي خَزَائِنُ اللَّهِ وَلَا أَعْلَمُ الْغَيْبَ وَلَا أَقُولُ لَكُمْ إِنِّي مَلَكٌ ۖ إِنْ أَتَّبِعُ إِلَّا مَا يُوحَىٰ إِلَيَّ ۚ قُلْ هَلْ يَسْتَوِي الْأَعْمَىٰ وَالْبَصِيرُ ۚ أَفَلَا تَتَفَكَّرُونَ

“Say [O Muhammad]: I do not say to you, I have with me the treasures of Allah, nor do I have knowledge of the Ghayb (unseen), nor do I say to you that I am an angel; I do not follow aught save that which is revealed to me. Say: Are the blind and the seeing one alike? Do you not then reflect?”

Some people reply to this by saying that the Prophet (saww) did not say “ I don’t have knowledge of Ghayb (unseen)”, rather he (saww) is saying to the Mushrikeen that “I DO NOT SAY TO YOU that I have Ilm al Ghayb”. Which means, he has knowledge of unseen, but he is just not saying it to the Mushrikeen.

What an illogical argument!! If we see the list of things which Rasulallah (saww) mentions that he will not say to the Mushrikeen, it also includes “nor do I say to you that I am an angel”, So does this mean that Rasulallah (saww) is an angel, but he is just not saying it to the Mushrikeen?

Verse 7:

Allah (swt) instructs the Prophet (saww) to say to his people, in Surah A’araf 7:188

قُل لَّا أَمْلِكُ لِنَفْسِي نَفْعًا وَلَا ضَرًّا إِلَّا مَا شَاءَ اللَّهُ ۚ وَلَوْ كُنتُ أَعْلَمُ الْغَيْبَ لَاسْتَكْثَرْتُ مِنَ الْخَيْرِ وَمَا مَسَّنِيَ السُّوءُ ۚ إِنْ أَنَا إِلَّا نَذِيرٌ وَبَشِيرٌ لِّقَوْمٍ يُؤْمِنُونَ

Say, “I hold not for myself [the power of] benefit or harm, except what Allah has willed. And if I knew the unseen, I could have acquired much good (wealth), and no harm would have touched me. I am not except a warner and a bringer of good tidings to a people who believe.”

What is this knowledge, which, if Rasulallah (saww) had, he could have acquired much good, and no harm would have touched him?

If an argument is made that this only means that his knowledge is not independent, rather given by Allah, then a question is raised, how is it possible that ONLY if Rasulallah (saww) had independent knowledge of unseen, only then he “could have acquired much good, and no harm would have touched him”, why is the same thing not possible with the same knowledge of unseen given by Allah?

For example, as person trips and falls down, and then he says “I already knew I will trip over here”, so someone asks him “Well if you knew you will trip over here, why weren’t you careful?”, so the other person replies by saying, “Because this is not my independent knowledge, someone else had told me”, so it will be said “it doesn’t matter whether your knowledge was independent or dependent, the point is, you had the knowledge, so you should have used it”.

Another point to ponder is, if the Prophet (saww) had knowledge of unseen, no harm would have touched him. Let’s look for an incident where some harm touched the Prophet (saww). In Battle of Uhud, some companions left their positions and left the Prophet (saww) unsafe, and hence the Prophet (saww) was hurt by the enemy, so some harm touched him, clearly if the Prophet (saww) knew the unseen, according to the verse, no harm would have touched him, but since harm did touch him, we know that he did not have knowledge of unseen.

Verse 8:

Allah (swt) instructs the Prophet (saww) to say to the people, in Surah ash Shura 42:52

كَذَٰلِكَ أَوْحَيْنَا إِلَيْكَ رُوحًا مِّنْ أَمْرِنَا ۚ مَا كُنتَ تَدْرِي مَا الْكِتَابُ وَلَا الْإِيمَانُ وَلَٰكِن جَعَلْنَاهُ نُورًا نَّهْدِي بِهِ مَن نَّشَاءُ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا ۚ وَإِنَّكَ لَتَهْدِي إِلَىٰ صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِيمٍ

“And thus did We reveal to you an inspired book by Our command. You did not know what the Book was, nor (what) the faith (was), but We made it a light, guiding thereby whom We please of Our servants; and most surely you show the way to the right path!”

This clearly shows that Rasulallah (saww) did not know about the Quran before it was revealed to him nor did he know about the faith. This does not mean that he used to worship idols. Since the Prophet (saww) was born in a house whose members were on the religion of Ibrahim (as), and were pure monotheists, there is no question of idol worship.

Verse 9:

When the people asked the Prophet (saww) about the time of the Day of Judgement, see what Allah (swt) asks the Prophet (saww) to reply. In Surah Mulk 67:25-26

وَيَقُولُونَ مَتَىٰ هَٰذَا الْوَعْدُ إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ

قُلْ إِنَّمَا الْعِلْمُ عِندَ اللَّهِ وَإِنَّمَا أَنَا نَذِيرٌ مُّبِينٌ

And they say, “When is this promise (day of judgment), if you should be truthful?”

Say, “The knowledge is only with Allah, and I am only a clear warner.”

Verse 10:

Again in Surah Jinn 72:25

قُلْ إِنْ أَدْرِي أَقَرِيبٌ مَّا تُوعَدُونَ أَمْ يَجْعَلُ لَهُ رَبِّي أَمَدً

Say, “I do not know if what you are promised (day of judgment) is near or if my Lord will grant for it a [long] period.”

People claim, that all the verses in the Quran which allude to the fact that the Prophet (saww) did not have Ilm al Ghayb only mean that the Prophet (saww) did not have “Independent” Ilm al Ghayb, rather his knowledge is “dependent” on Allah. These people cannot apply this principle here, because even if the Prophet (saww) had “dependent” knowledge from Allah (swt) about the Day of Judgment, he (saww) would not say “I do not know if what you are promised is near or……”. He could have said “I know when the promise will be fulfilled, but this is secret knowledge which cannot be revealed” but he (saww) did not say that.

Verse 11:

Allah (swt) says to the Prophet (saww), in Surah Ghafir 40:78

وَلَقَدْ أَرْسَلْنَا رُسُلًا مِّن قَبْلِكَ مِنْهُم مَّن قَصَصْنَا عَلَيْكَ وَمِنْهُم مَّن لَّمْ نَقْصُصْ عَلَيْكَ ۗ وَمَا كَانَ لِرَسُولٍ أَن يَأْتِيَ بِآيَةٍ إِلَّا بِإِذْنِ اللَّهِ ۚ فَإِذَا جَاءَ أَمْرُ اللَّهِ قُضِيَ بِالْحَقِّ وَخَسِرَ هُنَالِكَ الْمُبْطِلُونَ

And We have already sent messengers before you. Among them are those [whose stories] We have related to you, and among them are those [whose stories] We have not related to you. And it was not for any messenger to bring a sign [or verse] except by permission of Allah. So when the command of Allah comes, it will be concluded in truth, and the falsifiers will thereupon lose [all]

There are messengers who’s story has not been related to Rasulallah (saww), and if Allah did not tell Rasulallah (saww) surely there is no other way he can know.

If an argument is made that this ayat is not addressed to Rasulallah (saww) rather to his people, this can be refuted as Allah says, “qasasna ‘ALAIKA” not “‘alaikum”, also in the translation of Quran by Ali Quli Qarai (Shia translator of Quran), whenever something is addressed to Rasulallah, the word “you” is written in italics, and in the translation of this ayat also “you” is written in italics, therefore there is no doubt that this ayat is addressed to Rasulallah (saww).

Verse 12:

In Surah Nisa 4:164, Allah (swt) says to the Prophet (saww)

وَرُسُلًا قَدْ قَصَصْنَاهُمْ عَلَيْكَ مِن قَبْلُ وَرُسُلًا لَّمْ نَقْصُصْهُمْ عَلَيْكَ ۚ وَكَلَّمَ اللَّهُ مُوسَىٰ تَكْلِيمًا

And [We sent] messengers about whom We have related [their stories] to you before and messengers about whom We have not related to you. And Allah spoke to Moses with [direct] speech.

Again, if Allah (swt) did not relate the stories of some messengers to Rasulallah (saww), then he has no other way to know them.

Verse 13:

Allah (swt) says in Surah Ibrahim 14:9

أَلَمْ يَأْتِكُمْ نَبَأُ الَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِكُمْ قَوْمِ نُوحٍ وَعَادٍ وَثَمُودَ ۛ وَالَّذِينَ مِن بَعْدِهِمْ ۛ لَا يَعْلَمُهُمْ إِلَّا اللَّهُ ۚ جَاءَتْهُمْ رُسُلُهُم بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ فَرَدُّوا أَيْدِيَهُمْ فِي أَفْوَاهِهِمْ وَقَالُوا إِنَّا كَفَرْنَا بِمَا أُرْسِلْتُم بِهِ وَإِنَّا لَفِي شَكٍّ مِّمَّا تَدْعُونَنَا إِلَيْهِ مُرِيبٍ

Has there not reached you the news of those before you – the people of Noah and ‘Aad and Thamud and those after them? No one knows them but Allah. Their messengers brought them clear proofs, but they returned their hands to their mouths and said, “Indeed, we disbelieve in that with which you have been sent, and indeed we are, about that to which you invite us, in disquieting doubt.”

“No one knows them except Allah”, does Rasulallah (saww) come in “except Allah” or not? ofcourse he does, it means clearly that the knowledge of those after ‘Aad and Thamud is not with Rasulallah (saww), as it is ONLY with Allah and there is no exception to this.

This clearly proves that Allah (swt) has NOT given the Prophet (saww) the knowledge of everything. The Prophet (saww) only knew about certain past and future events (like the ones that are in Quran), and whatever the Imams (as) knew, they had learnt it from the Quran and the Prophet (saww), hence is goes without saying that even the Imams (as) did not have the knowledge of everything.


3 responses »

  1. Pingback: List of Posts | Shia Reformist

  2. Beautiful elaboration of Quranic evidence. Baarak’Allahu Feek. Yes indeed, the problem is that a false narrative is continually conveyed i.e. that “the Prophet (saww) and Imams (as) have full knowledge of everything from the past and future..”. If this was so, and if we were supposed to rely on it (by supplicating to them), then why is it not mentioned anywhere in God’s book? What are such fantastic beliefs based on few unreliable hadith here and there? When Allah swt did not say it, they fabricated it, and the loss is great in the grave & hereafter. Is it not sufficient to read the detailed seerah of the lives of the Aimmah of the Ahlul-Bayt to see how they were natural living beings? The fantastic fabrications are an anomaly to their seerah. They lived naturally and died naturally (by sword, poison, etc). If they knew that they were being poisoned, and they drank it, that would have been suicide and a big sin! These were very pious people. Many were assassinated by poison, and ofcourse they did not know.


  3. Pingback: Part 2: 9 things given to Imam Ali (as) | Shia Reformist

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: